• Wednesday, Oct 05, 2022
  • Last Update : 10:24 am

OP-ED: The clean feed conundrum

  • Published at 12:52 am October 7th, 2021
Clean feed
BIGSTOCK

Any restriction has to be followed up with options to meet viewer expectations

It should have happened years ago when an official notification made it mandatory for only clean feed broadcasting of foreign channels by cable operators. The unfair advantage advertising gave to products sold in Bangladesh side-tracking tax, promoting messages irrelevant to Bangladeshi viewers has long been a bane to the local manufacturers, agencies, and private television owners. 

A previous attempt to block specific channels broadcasting from India was tried and failed. Matters had come to such a fore that producers that decided to join the group also began advertising on these channels till their wings were clipped.

The argument at the time was that India refused to allow reciprocal broadcasts of all TV broadcasts from Bangladesh on the same ground of advertising advantage. The broad letters of definition written when tobacco advertising was still permissible in Bangladesh doesn’t hold good any more; it hasn’t for years. Several discussions at government levels has resulted only in telecast and broadcast of the official government media, BTV, Doordarshan, and Bangladesh Betar programs on specific days and at specific times. 

BTV World is also free to air broadcasts that don’t go anywhere near the popularity of Indian channels for their movies, drama, and even news. 

International channels such as BBC, CNN, Al Jazeera, National Geographic, Animal Planet, and Sports channels have planned their broadcasts aimed at the sub-continent in a way so as to encourage advertisers of countries. India jumped on the bandwagon with promotional content of goods, services, tourism, and much more. It compounded Bangladesh’s headaches mainly due to the product, services, and calls for investment by countries outside of the region. 

Greece promoted its tourism, as did India. Japan used the channels heavily for the Olympics and tourism. The return on investment mathematics didn’t, barring India, have Bangladesh or others in mind as a target audience. The popular telecast of Indian Premier League T-20 tournament was appropriately hyped up to garner viewership, thereby creating the attractiveness of advertising.

In between the popularity of especially soap operas has led to an acceptability of such channels, so much so that there are viewers that are miffed. Most of these dramas are hemmed in with religious belief, thereby able to influence young minds. In the 1980s, when Indian TV was way behind in development, Indian policy-makers were shocked when school-children named our president as theirs. Local artistes were recognizable on the streets of Kolkata. 

It’s far different now, as regulatory guidelines were loosened and full creativity was unleashed. Indian films and drama are careful to thread in religious themes in their script, screenplay, and music to meet with viewer approbation. A similar approach in Bangladesh is missing and would have been met with a flurry of outrage from the secular voices.

The impact, particularly on impressionable minds, has been significant, bringing with it visible changes to various aspects of social and cultural fabric. The latest government move to prevent advertising loaded foreign content is ostensibly more focused on the commercial aspect. The cultural engineering side of it hasn’t been mentioned. The effect of such a bar on the more international channels certainly has a commercial ring to it. 

Private channel owners are firm in their opinion. If a viewer wishes to pay and be exposed to such advertising, well and good. That’s what the viewer does when subscribing to cable operators. It includes local channels. Channel owners have lived up to the governments’ persuasion of telecasting using Bangabandhu-1 satellite. 

As it is, another recent decision of charging a premium tax on advertising featuring foreign models has also come into force. Preventing local manufacturers from advertising in foreign media, particularly India, was designed to prevent illegal money transfer no matter that those products are also exported to that country. 

It’s not an unusual measure. Governments around the world have fined Amazon and Google for not paying applicable taxes for products sold to consumers in different countries. Similar is the case with advertising on social media. Slow as it may have been, Google and Facebook have now begun paying taxes. The loopholes still exist. They will. 

What’s important is that a beginning is made.

The clean feed debate will drag on. What should come with it is measures to prevent cultural aggression that is clearly designed to influence thoughts. Any restriction has to be followed up with options to meet viewer expectations. Quality and production standards of local movies and dramas have to go beyond that currently dished out. 

The obsession with past literary themes and unwillingness to embrace the more current trends is part of the muddle that must be dealt with. Whether through state patronage or philanthropic organizations, food alone won’t do the trick. Food for thought is where most of the answers lie.    

Mahmudur Rahman is a writer, columnist, broadcaster, and communications specialist.

204
Facebook 200
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail