• Sunday, Sep 25, 2022
  • Last Update : 09:54 am

Law enforcement needs exemptions in India's privacy bill

  • Published at 09:29 am December 11th, 2019
Video camera, cam privacy

The proposed government exemptions have alarmed privacy advocates

Allowing law enforcement to commit "authorised privacy violations" will ensure investigations are not hindered, a senior government official told Reuters on Wednesday, amid worries that India's privacy law will increase state surveillance.

The Personal Data Protection Bill covers how data of Indian users is stored, processed and transferred, and will apply to technology companies and government agencies.

But the bill says any government agency can be exempted from the law "in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India" or for "preventing incitement" of certain offences, a provision privacy advocates said would allow agencies to abuse access.

The official, who is directly involved with the bill and declined to be identified because discussions are ongoing, said those exemptions were necessary for law enforcement bodies such as the Central Bureau of Investigation - India's version of the American FBI - that need to access and analyze data.

"This provides for a future where an agency can do authorized privacy violations with checks and balances," said the official.

India's information technology minister, Ravi Shankar Prasad, said on Wednesday the bill would be sent to a parliamentary panel for further review.

The government will come up with a list of organizations exempt from all or some of the privacy bill, the senior official added.

Other provisions may affect big technology companies such as Facebook and Alphabet Inc's Google by empowering the government to request user data.

The proposed government exemptions have alarmed privacy advocates.

Raman Jit Singh Chima, Asia policy director at Access Now, an international digital rights organization, said they were "deeply concerning" and said current surveillance safeguards were insufficient.

The proposed bill empowers the government to exempt an agency from the law if doing so is "necessary or expedient," without defining those terms.

"The lack of an explanation on what is necessary and expedient is worrisome, there needs to be a body of multiple stakeholders that reviews these decisions," said Kriti Trehan, a partner specializing in technology law at the Law Offices of Panag & Babu.

Facebook 50
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail